Enough is as good as a feast: A Comprehensive Analysis of How Reinforcement Learning Mitigates Task Conflicts in LLMs
TL;DR - This study finds that reinforcement learning produces specialized LLMs that retain more performance when merged than supervised fine-tuned models. It attributes this advantage to RL updates that cause less parameter interference across tasks.
- Evaluations span five representative tasks and compare RL-trained models with SFT-trained counterparts.
- On-policy RL data yields smaller gradient updates, reducing the risk of overwriting knowledge from other tasks.
- As RL converges, its objective progressively reduces the magnitude and number of conflicting parameter updates.
- Joint optimization of positive and negative examples directs models toward less biased task-specific parameter subspaces.