How Many Bits Can an Adapter Write? Measuring the Capacity and Memorization of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
Ranking
Overall
79
Content
95
Popularity
42
Observed public metrics from 1 member.
Merged summary
TL;DR - This paper quantifies how much information LoRA adapters memorize when fine-tuning frozen models. It finds that capacity and privacy leakage depend more on adapter placement and base-model structure than raw parameter count.
- Adapters store a few bits per trainable parameter, less than full fine-tuning.
- Moving an equal parameter budget from attention to MLP layers nearly doubles capacity.
- Capacity largely disappears when the frozen base model’s structure is removed.
- In Qwen2.5 experiments, leakage tracks written bits; supervised tuning memorizes secrets verbatim, while training on verifiable rewards does not.
Sources (1)
How Many Bits Can an Adapter Write? Measuring the Capacity and Memorization of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
Public signals
Semantic Scholar citations 0 · Semantic Scholar influential citations 0
TL;DR - This paper quantifies how much information LoRA adapters memorize when fine-tuning frozen models. It finds that capacity and privacy leakage depend more on adapter placement and base-model structure than raw parameter count.
- Adapters store a few bits per trainable parameter, less than full fine-tuning.
- Moving an equal parameter budget from attention to MLP layers nearly doubles capacity.
- Capacity largely disappears when the frozen base model’s structure is removed.
- In Qwen2.5 experiments, leakage tracks written bits; supervised tuning memorizes secrets verbatim, while training on verifiable rewards does not.