缓存命中率99.93%！DeepSeek最适合的Harness来了，GitHub狂揽8.6万Star
Ranking
Overall
68
Content
75
Popularity
N/A
No observed public metrics; popularity remains neutral/archived.
Merged summary
TL;DR - Open-source coding-agent harness Pi reportedly pairs efficiently with DeepSeek by preserving stable, append-only context, achieving roughly 99.93% cache hits and the lowest successful-task cost in a benchmark of eight harnesses.
- Pi defaults to four tools—file reading, writing, editing, and command execution—with optional capabilities added through extensions and skills.
- Native DeepSeek support preserves reasoning content, maps reasoning levels, and fixes session-replay compatibility issues.
- Composio’s benchmark reported an average cost of about $0.028 per successful task for Pi, versus $0.195 for Claude Code using the same DeepSeek model.
- DeepSeek is reportedly building an official coding harness to connect its models with terminals, repositories, and developer toolchains.
Sources (1)
缓存命中率99.93%！DeepSeek最适合的Harness来了，GitHub狂揽8.6万Star
Public signals
N/A
TL;DR - Open-source coding-agent harness Pi reportedly pairs efficiently with DeepSeek by preserving stable, append-only context, achieving roughly 99.93% cache hits and the lowest successful-task cost in a benchmark of eight harnesses.
- Pi defaults to four tools—file reading, writing, editing, and command execution—with optional capabilities added through extensions and skills.
- Native DeepSeek support preserves reasoning content, maps reasoning levels, and fixes session-replay compatibility issues.
- Composio’s benchmark reported an average cost of about $0.028 per successful task for Pi, versus $0.195 for Claude Code using the same DeepSeek model.
- DeepSeek is reportedly building an official coding harness to connect its models with terminals, repositories, and developer toolchains.