DeepSeek最适合的Harness开源！
Ranking
Overall
64
Content
70
Popularity
N/A
No observed public metrics; popularity remains neutral/archived.
Merged summary
TL;DR - Open-source coding-agent harness Pi has added native DeepSeek support and reportedly achieves exceptionally high prompt-cache reuse, substantially reducing agent task costs. It highlights how harness design can materially affect the efficiency of the same underlying model.
- Pi defaults to four tools—file reading, writing, editing, and command execution—while exposing advanced capabilities through extensions and skills.
- Its append-oriented, stable context structure reportedly delivered 99.93–99.97% cache-hit rates with DeepSeek.
- A Composio comparison found Pi’s average cost per successful DeepSeek V4 Flash task was about $0.028, versus roughly $0.195 for Claude Code.
- DeepSeek is reportedly assembling an internal team to build an official coding harness positioned against Claude Code.
Sources (1)
DeepSeek最适合的Harness开源！
Public signals
N/A
TL;DR - Open-source coding-agent harness Pi has added native DeepSeek support and reportedly achieves exceptionally high prompt-cache reuse, substantially reducing agent task costs. It highlights how harness design can materially affect the efficiency of the same underlying model.
- Pi defaults to four tools—file reading, writing, editing, and command execution—while exposing advanced capabilities through extensions and skills.
- Its append-oriented, stable context structure reportedly delivered 99.93–99.97% cache-hit rates with DeepSeek.
- A Composio comparison found Pi’s average cost per successful DeepSeek V4 Flash task was about $0.028, versus roughly $0.195 for Claude Code.
- DeepSeek is reportedly assembling an internal team to build an official coding harness positioned against Claude Code.